Participatory Designs and Epistemic Authority in Knowledge Platforms for Sustainability
نویسندگان
چکیده
Expert organizations increasingly adopt participatory strategies to strengthen their knowledge claims. We introduce the notion of platforms for sustainability conceptualize expert that not only rhetorically embrace but also actively attempt institutionalize norm stakeholder participation in seeking authority governance. In doing so, they encounter a tension between ambition and conventional foundations epistemic authority, such as scientific autonomy consensus. Taking this starting point, we utilize dynamic perspective on investigate contestations over institutional designs. compare institutionalization two sustainability—the Intergovernmental Platform Biodiversity Ecosystem Services, research platform Future Earth: Research Global Sustainability. Our comparison reveals designs open up process creation evaluation. Yet, reinforce existing power structures by redrawing boundaries protect privilege relationships with elite actors.
منابع مشابه
Fundamentalism and Epistemic Authority
I will discuss three questions in my paper: 1. What are the essential elements of fundamentalism? 2. What is the role of authority as a source of fundamentalism? 3. What is the role of trust in the spreading of fundamentalism? For each question I will outline a possible answer from a special theoretical point of view. What is " fundamentalism " ? There is an ongoing discussion about this questi...
متن کاملArnon Keren * Epistemic Authority , Testimony and the Transmission of Knowledge
I present an account of what it is to trust a speaker, and argue that the account can explain the common intuitions which structure the debate about the transmission view of testimony. According to the suggested account, to trust a speaker is to grant her epistemic authority on the asserted proposition, and hence to see her opinion as issuing a second order, preemptive reason for believing the ...
متن کاملNegotiating Epistemic Authority
Why do we trust what other people say, and form beliefs on the basis of their speech? One answer: they are taken to have epistemic authority. Intuitively this means that the other person (or institution, or group) is taken to be authoritative in what they say, at least with respect to a particular domain. Here, we want to claim that there are (at least) two varieties of epistemic authority, one...
متن کاملpragmatic knowledge in university entrance exam for english majors
abstract pragmatics is the study of communicative action in its sociocultural context. communicative action includes not only using speech acts (such as apologizing, complaining, complimenting, and requesting), but also engaging in different types of discourse and participating in speech events of varying length and complexity. the present study aimed to investigate the assessment of pragm...
15 صفحه اولefl learners collocational knowledge in writing and translation
این مطالعه به بررسی دانش همنشین های دانشجویان زبان انگلیسی فارسی زبان می پردازد. در ابتدا، ارتباط یین دانش عمومی زبان و دانش همنشین های زبان آموزان مورد بررسی قرار می گیرد. دومین هدف این مطالعه بررسی استراتژیهای مورد استفاده در ترجمه همنشین های انگلیسی به فارسی است. در نهایت، خطا های زبان آموزان در تولید و درک همنشین ها مورد آنالیز و بررسی قرار می گیرد. دویست و بیست هفت دانشجوی زبان در این مطال...
ذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
ژورنال
عنوان ژورنال: Global Environmental Politics
سال: 2021
ISSN: ['1526-3800', '1536-0091']
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1162/glep_a_00573